Corruption: 10 arrests by the Guardia di Finanza between Rome and Caserta

As part of their efforts to combat corruption in public administration, officers from the Guardia di Finanza's Special Anti-Corruption Unit, acting on behalf of the Rome Public Prosecutor's Office, executed an order for precautionary measures issued by the Rome investigating judge against 10 individuals, including three professionals, four entrepreneurs, and three public officials, for the crimes of corruption, fraudulent bankruptcy, money laundering, and forgery.

It might interest you

Accident scam exposed: insurance companies defrauded of €200

13-11-2025, 15:35:08

The Clan's Coffee: The Silent War Between the D'Alessandros for Control of Castellammare's Bars

13-11-2025, 10:23:59

Maxi-trial on prison violence: Justice system risks a reset. Lawyers on the warpath.

12-11-2025, 21:23:05

Castellammare, candles lit outside the homes of extortion victims: the macabre method of the D'Alessandro clan.

12-11-2025, 21:05:53

During the investigation, conducted by the Rome Special Anti-Corruption Unit through numerous wiretaps, shadowing, document acquisitions at public offices, and bank checks, corruption was uncovered by a well-known Roman professional with ties to parliamentary political circles, with the assistance of several administrators of the municipality of San Marcellino (Caserta). The corruption was related to the contract for the management of the public street lighting service awarded to the company "Tlsled Esco srl," linked to the suspects. In the past, the principal suspect held various positions, including board member of Anas SpA and director and treasurer of the "Fondazione della Libertà per il bene comune." The investigation also focused on the bankruptcies of the companies Setecna and Blustar, which were effectively traced back to an entrepreneur and an accountant who, including through front men, diverted significant financial resources from the companies, causing unfair damage to creditors. The investigation also revealed that a public official, a member of the police force, in exchange for financial benefits, had committed acts contrary to his official duties and was therefore placed under house arrest.

Article published on February 6, 2020 - 09:45 AM - Editorial Staff