Naples, the DDA wanted to arrest Tina Rispoli and her son

The Naples DDA had requested the arrest of Tina Rispoli and the son Crescenzo Marino accused of Camorra-style criminal association.

But the investigating judge rejected them because there was no evidence. In the investigation into Marine clan with Celestial Houses di Secongilian, the names of mother and son also appear. She has been in the news for some years now for her famous marriage to the neo melodic singer Tony Colombo. She had previously been married to the boss Gaetano Marino called Stump killed on the Terracina coast on August 23, 2012.

The investigating judge Anna Tirone rejected the request for the arrest of 22 people while the boss ended up in prison (as anticipated yesterday by the newspaper Il Roma) Roberto Manganiello, 40 years old, Magdalene Emperor, 40 years old; Luigi Cioffi (who is currently untraceable), 35 years old, Gaetano Thin, 47 years old, Mariano Isaiah, 46 years old, Lorenzo Celentano, 26 years old, Ciro Peluso, 24 years old, Mark Scaglione, 32 years old, Francesco Montemurro, 44 years old, and Salvatore Sanges, 32 years.

According to the prosecutors' reconstruction, Tina Rispoli and her son Crescenzo Marino would have participated in the management of the clan's cash, also receiving monthly proceeds.

And in the records of the investigation there are the statements of numerous informants including Gianluca Giugliano, former man of the Marino clan. The collaborator of justice - as reported by Il Roma - on 10 October 2012, after having indicated all the new leaders and participants of the gang, put on record that “Tina Rispoli was aware of what her husband was doing”, also reporting “that the monthly shares that were shared by the participants were given by Manganiello directly into the hands of Tina Rispoli”.

YOU MAY ALSO BE INTERESTED IN:Naples, he bit off his rival's ear: 4 years and 4 months and house arrest for Tina Rispoli's son

Statements that evidently were not enough as evidence, so the investigating judge rejected the request for arrest. Now we await the decisions of the DDA on a possible appeal to a request for second arrest supported by new evidence.