Marano, Taglialatela remains in prison. The investigating judge: "He can commit other crimes"

Marano. Remains in prison Aurelio Taglialatela, the 19-year-old accused of murdering his peer Corrado Finale and the attempted murder of an 18-year-old boyfriend of her sister.

The investigating judge Fabrizio Strong of the Court of Naples North did not validate the arrest but ordered the precautionary custody in the prison of Poggioreale because "if not subjected to adequate precautionary measures, may commit further crimes of the same kind
especially those who are being prosecuted, despite their formal clean criminal record and their young age".

A heavy evidentiary framework that his defenders, the lawyers, have tried to dismantle or at least to tone down. Luigi Poziello e Alfonso Vozza. But the investigating judge recalled how Aurelio Taglialatela she had already tried to attack her sister's ex-boyfriend in the past.

Namely, 18-year-old UG, the passenger of the Honda TMax that threw an object at Taglialatela's Fiat 500, breaking the window and triggering the deadly chase.

And the investigating judge in the provision in which he orders the precautionary custody in prison writes:
“As for the choice of the measure to be applied, it is worth noting the particular unscrupulousness demonstrated by Taglialatela, as well as the fact that he appears to be supported by a family context inclined to reticence and poor collaboration with the authorities”.

And yet: “Moreover, some of his relatives had been directly involved in the arguments and even physical and verbal confrontations that the boy had with his sister's ex-boyfriend.”

And that's why “the precautionary detention in prison, invoked by the public prosecutor, is considered the only one adequate to contain the concrete and present danger of committing crimes of the same kind, since it is not possible to rely in any way, at this stage, on the defendant's ability to self-contain and on the collaboration, in this sense, of his family members”.

The investigating judge criticizes the young man: "He cannot benefit from any benefits"

And finally a judgment that weighs like a millstone:“It is hardly necessary to add that the intramural custodial measure appears proportionate to the seriousness of the crimes attributed to him and to the extent of the sentence that will likely be imposed for them in court and in relation to which it does not appear that the accused will be able to enjoy any benefit”.