They shot at the camera of a jewelry store, perhaps for fun, but their action triggered immediate investigations: two 14-year-olds from the area, both with no criminal record, were reported by the police for damage after having hit the video surveillance system of a commercial business with an air pistol.
The episode dates back to March 17, when the owner of the jewelry store on Via Plinio went to the local police station to report the damage to the external camera. The initial suspicion was that the act could be a signal for an attempted theft or an intimidation for extortion purposes. For this reason, the military immediately began investigations, analyzing the images recorded by the security system.
The footage revealed a different reality: two young men, with their faces covered and riding a scooter, stopped in front of the jewelry store and took aim. They fired several shots with an air pistol, hitting and damaging the camera. 16 pellets were found on the spot.
The identification of the two teenagers led the Carabinieri to carry out searches in their homes. In one of the houses, a spring gun with a red cap, two magazines and 101 pellets were found and seized. The two minors will now have to answer to the charge of damage.
In short
They shot at a jewelry store's security camera, perhaps for fun, but their actions sparked immediate investigations: two local 14-year-olds, both with no criminal record, were reported by the…
- The incident dates back to March 17, when the owner of the jewelry store on Via Plinio went to the local train station…
- The initial suspicion was that the act could be a sign of an attempted theft or an act of intimidation for extortion purposes.
- For this reason, the military immediately began investigations, analyzing the images recorded by the security system.
Key questions
What is the main point of the news?
They shot at a jewelry store's security camera, perhaps for fun, but their actions sparked immediate investigations: two 14-year-old locals, both with no criminal record,…
Why is this news relevant?
The incident dates back to March 17, when the owner of the jewelry store on Via Plinio went to the local train station…
Which detail helps us understand the case better?
The initial suspicion was that the act could be a sign of an attempted theft or an act of intimidation for extortion purposes.
It's really strange that two young boys did something like that, even if it was for fun. But maybe they don't realize the consequences that their actions can have. Let's hope they learn from their mistakes.