-
Camorra Cesarano murder: three killers from Boscoreale arrested. The boss's wife is also among them.9 September 2025 - 15:27
-
26 August 2025 - 06:47
During the maxi-trial of the Moccia Camorra clan, currently underway before the Seventh Criminal Section of the Naples court, Judge Raffaele Donnarumma reportedly described the lists of witnesses presented by the defendants' lawyers as "lists of witnesses vomited out in this trial," according to press reports.
The sentence apparently dates back to the November 10 hearing and is listed as transcribed in the minutes, a factor that amplified its institutional and media impact.
The reaction in the courtroom was immediate: the lawyers asked the president of the panel for clarification, who confirmed that he had uttered those words and that he took responsibility for them.
That challenge was followed by a motion to challenge Donnarumma, in which the defense team argued a lack of respect incompatible with the protection of defense rights in a proceeding of this magnitude.
Nordio's words and the institutional clash
The matter quickly moved beyond the courtroom to the political and institutional arena, with the intervention of Justice Minister Carlo Nordio. Commenting on the news, the Minister of Justice called the statement attributed to the judge "of unprecedented gravity," if confirmed, emphasizing the incompatibility of such tones with the respect due to the right to a fair hearing.
The minister's entry into the debate adds another layer of tension to a trial already embroiled in protests and suspicions of imbalance between the prosecution and defense. Nordio's remarks are interpreted by lawyers as confirmation of the sensitive nature of the case, while judicial circles fear a further delegitimization of the prosecution and adjudicating judiciary under the media spotlight.
A maxi-trial between media, pressure and recusals
The proceedings against the Moccia clan, which have dozens of defendants in the dock, have been the subject of controversy for months due to a climate described by many as "poisonous" by media overload and the accelerated timing of the hearings.
It might interest you
Camorra "Capitoni" boss freed again: Giuseppe Lo Russo leaves the 41 bis regime and returns to Milan.
Pomigliano feud: Boss Olindo Cipoletta admits: "I'm responsible."
Naples, four "smugglers" acquitted: "They were migrants on the run, not traffickers."
Camorra: Three centuries of prison sentences requested for Pomigliano clans
The court president's decision to hold four hearings per week, exempting judges from other hearings and reducing the witness lists, was challenged by the defense as a restriction of the right to an adversarial hearing.
In this context, the phrase about "vomited witnesses" is interpreted by lawyers as a symptom of a prejudicial attitude towards defense evidence, so much so that it is invoked not only in the motion for recusal, but also in requests to transfer the trial due to legitimate suspicion.
The Criminal Chambers have already called for abstentions and protests, denouncing a situation in which the pursuit of speed risks prevailing over safeguards, with the danger that the maxi-trial will end up "under indictment" before a decision on the defendants has even been made.
The role of the media and the issue of impartiality
The public narrative of a trial transformed into a symbolic battleground between the "good" represented by the prosecutor's actions and the "evil" identified with the defendants and their defense attorneys weighs heavily on the case. In their motion for a legitimate suspicion, the lawyers cite articles, posts, and social media posts that, they argue, fuel the idea of a predetermined guilt, increasing the risk of judges being subjected to external pressure.
The incident involving prosecutor Nicola Gratteri, who was present in court wearing a robe to support his colleagues on the prosecution, was cited by the defense as a key step in raising the media profile of the proceedings and polarizing public opinion.
Donnarumma's statement, which has come under fire from the press, politicians and lawyers, has thus become the latest trigger in a crisis of confidence that puts the impartiality of the judging panel and the maintenance of a fair trial at the centre of one of the most delicate trials in Naples in recent years.
Comments (1)
This is an article that discusses some very serious matters in the trial. Lawyers complain and say their rights are being disregarded, but the press is making noise and perhaps not helping to clarify matters. More clarity is needed.