Cava de' Tirreni – The judicial investigation into the clashes that occurred on September 29, 2024, shortly before kickoff of the soccer match between Cavese and Latina, has concluded with eleven convictions. The investigating judge of the Nocera Inferiore Court, Federico Noschese, sentenced each defendant—all ultras of the blue-foncè team—to two years and four months in prison following the summary trials held in recent days.
The judge granted all the defendants mitigating circumstances equivalent to the aggravating ones, thus determining a moderate basic sentence. Three of the eleven fans were also acquitted of several additional charges, including resisting a public official and violating banishment orders.
The foiled attack on the Pontine fans' bus
According to the reconstruction by the DIGOS (Special Operations Unit) and the Cava de' Tirreni police station, at least sixty Cava ultras—wearing hoods and identically dressed—had set up an ambush to intercept the buses carrying Latina's visiting supporters. The security service set up by the police prevented direct contact between the two fan groups.
Blocked by barriers and officers lined up in the street, the home fans vented their anger at the police: a veritable hail of stones lasted 6-7 minutes, with sticks, glass bottles, rocks, smoke bombs, and even a firecracker that exploded just meters from the officers. The attack forced several passersby and residents to take refuge in the parking lot of a nearby business.
Officers closed the surrounding streets to traffic—particularly Corso Mazzini, Viale Romano, and Via Marconi—and managed to restore calm only after dispersing the group. The match then proceeded regularly that afternoon without further incident.
The investigations and the protests
The defendants were identified thanks to footage from the city's video surveillance cameras and the thorough investigative work of the judicial police. The total number of Cavese fans present that day was estimated at over 500, but only eleven were charged with the most serious offences.
The main charge contested—with varying nuances depending on individual positions—was public intimidation through the use of offensive objects (considered in this case as improper "weapons"). The defense, represented by attorney Mario Secondino, specifically challenged the reliability of the photographic and video identification of the defendants. Now, with the sentencing reasons expected within 60 days, it will be possible to learn the judge's detailed reasoning on each of the charges.
Source EDITORIAL TEAM
Comments (1)
This article describes a complex and serious situation. It's important to consider how violence in sports can have serious legal consequences. Fans should seek better ways to express their support without resorting to violence.