Il 30 dicembre, mentre la città si preparava ai festeggiamenti di fine anno, tra i corridoi asettici dell’Ospedale Monaldi di Napoli il silenzio non era sinonimo di pace, ma di un’inquietudine che stava per farsi inchiesta.
A small heart, destined to give life to young Domenico, had failed to restart. The "official word" spoke of a post-surgical complication, a calculated but tragic risk. Yet, beneath those technicalities, something jarred.
The “Whispers” and the Mud Machine
It all began with "internal whispers." Today, Anna Iervolino, the general manager of Azienda dei Colli, broke the silence with a letter to the newspaper Il Mattino, claiming responsibility for the search for the truth. While public opinion was raising its voice, fueling what the general manager calls "ferocious superficiality," the administration was already digging.
Before the magistrates, before the headlines, the internal investigation had already begun. "A child was taken from his mother," writes Iervolino, bringing the focus back to the human pain that bureaucracy often numbs. But the accusation is clear: while outside they were searching for the "culprit for the crowd," inside the hospital, 296 pages of reports were being drawn up that now form the backbone of the judicial investigation.
December 30: The Audit of Truth
The investigation wasn't born out of inertia, but out of doubt. On December 30th, management summoned the surgeon and the head of the transplant program. It wasn't a routine meeting, but the beginning of a series of hearings and interrogations. From those meetings, the truth about the organ preservation system and the sometimes opaque dynamics of the operating room emerged.
Iervolino strongly rejects the accusation of concealment: "The documents were made available to the judicial authorities as early as January 11th." The defense's argument is detailed: if we now know about the malfunctioning machinery or procedural errors, it's because the company itself has investigated its own executives, resulting in suspensions and dismissals with "no discounts for anyone."
The public service dilemma
However, there's a precarious balance that the Directorate General emphasizes: the need to shed light on the situation without shutting down the machinery. The pediatric cardiac surgery unit at Monaldi Hospital is the only one in Campania. Shutting it down because of the scandal would have meant condemning more children. For this reason, the investigation has been running on a parallel track to continuity of care.
The issue of communication remains. "Talking to the patient is a doctor's duty," Iervolino recalls, confirming that even his silence toward Domenico's family was subject to disciplinary action. Between chats acquired by prosecutors and reports written under pressure, the Monaldi case reflects a healthcare system struggling to reform, between a mother's cry and the severity of a report.
I understand the dilemma between saving the service and providing the full truth, but the director's letter appears defensive and is not enough. We need more dialogue with relatives and more transparency on reports and chats, without stopping cardiac surgery but with clearer responsibilities.
Reading the details it seems that the protocols were too tangled and the communication took too long, there are hearings but they do not match certain reports and times so doubts remain about responsibility and maintenance of the machinery we hope for clarifications
The article attempts to explain, but the situation remains unclear and confusing. The facts shouldn't be brushed aside with technicalities, because the family deserves clear answers. There appear to have been delays, poorly managed documents, and poorly monitored machinery, and internal and external communication appears to have been disorganized and inconsistent.