ROME – VAR is not untouchable, and its use will be the subject of a reassessment at the end of the season. After eight years of application in Italian football, the video assistance system is entering a new phase of evaluation. This is according to Gianluca Rocchi, referee designator for Serie A and B, who spoke during the programme “Open Var” on DAZN.
The "clear and evident error" principle, Rocchi explains, was created to ensure a delicate balance: intervening as little as possible while maximizing the benefit of the match. Today, however, the context has changed. Technology has evolved, and with it the expectations of fans, clubs, and insiders. Some accuse VAR of disrupting the rhythm of matches too much, while others, conversely, believe it should intervene more frequently. This tension requires a comprehensive evaluation at the end of the championship, in line with what will happen in other international competitions.
According to Rocchi, it's no longer possible to think the way it was in the early days. The public is struggling to accept that technology can't intervene in situations that appear decisive, such as a potential penalty kick. The upcoming regulatory changes will move precisely toward broader use in certain cases, while leaving open the debate on its limitations and opportunities.
At the heart of his speech remains the theme of consistency, which he cites as the cornerstone of refereeing. Not always easy to maintain, but essential. The last few league games, with very few VAR interventions and very high playing time, demonstrate that when referees manage to ensure fluidity, the entertainment benefits. In some recent matches, the average of refereeing has reached nearly 58 minutes of effective playing time, a significant figure for Serie A.
Rocchi reiterates that the referee shouldn't become a central figure. Matches, he emphasizes, are decided by the players, and the referee should limit himself to not influencing the outcome. He cites the example of Roma-Juventus, a game played with a positive attitude by both teams and well-managed by the referee, a sign that behavior on the pitch also influences the perception of decisions.
Among the new features coming from the 2026 World Cup is the ability for VAR to intervene to overturn clearly incorrect second yellow cards, without however awarding a second yellow card that wasn't given. It will also be possible to correct incorrectly awarded corners, with prompt communication to the referee. A second yellow, Rocchi notes, can change a match, especially if it comes in the opening minutes, and for this reason, the review seems like the right choice.
Source EDITORIAL TEAM
Comments (2)
I think it's right that we discuss VAR, but I don't think it's untouchable. Too many rules have changed and people don't understand anymore. The referee should be more consistent. Technology helps, but it doesn't always understand what's happening and creates confusion.
I partially agree, but I also disagree. VAR was supposed to be clear and effective, but now the rules change frequently and the breaks become too long, the crowd gets distracted, and the referees tend to over-indulge in the game. A clearer, more consistent rule is needed.