Camorra and online betting

Illegal gambling to finance the gang: the Supreme Court upholds prison sentence for the collector.

The appeal by the son of a longtime member of the Secondigliano clan has been rejected. Wiretaps confirm his role as a liaison in managing the illegal platforms active between 2023 and 2024.
Listen to this article now...
Loading ...

The Supreme Court of Cassation has put a stop to the pre-trial detention of one of the alleged linchpins of the Licciardi clan's underground economy. The prison sentence has been confirmed for a suspect accused of criminal conspiracy aimed at the illegal management of gambling and betting, aggravated by mafia methods. For the Supreme Court, the Naples Review Court's case is solid: the individual acted as the operational arm of the Secondigliano group, managing a significant flow of money from unauthorized gambling circuits.

Add Cronache della Campania as a Favorite Source on Google

The investigation, conducted by the Carabinieri of Castello di Cisterna, revealed a complex criminal structure active between 2023 and 2024. The clan allegedly established a veritable network parallel to the state's, consisting of online platforms with servers abroad and physical branches spread throughout the province of Naples. This system allowed them to circumvent concessions from the Customs and Monopolies Agency, guaranteeing enormous profits directly to the Camorra.

At the center of the proceedings is the appellant, described by investigators as the official "collector" of the sums earmarked for the clan. The son of a longtime Licciardi associate, the man allegedly exploited his criminal pedigree to claim the payments. Wiretaps and audio recordings incriminated him: in several passages, described as "clear" by the judges, it clearly emerges that the money demanded was not the result of personal debts, but rather proceeds from the management of the clan's gambling sites.

In its ruling, the Supreme Court reiterated that, during the pre-trial phase, definitive proof of the crime is not required, but rather a "qualified probability of guilt." The Neapolitan magistrates' reasoning was deemed logical and coherent, especially in outlining how the organization had structured an alternative channel to legal websites.

The appeal was therefore dismissed, with the court ordering the payment of legal costs. The decision confirms the dangers of the "shadow" gambling business, which continues to represent one of the most lucrative financial sources for the clans of the Secondigliano Alliance.

In short

The Supreme Court of Cassation has put a stop to the pre-trial detention of one of the alleged linchpins of the Licciardi clan's underground economy.

  • The prison sentence has been confirmed for a suspect accused of criminal conspiracy aimed at the illegal management…
  • According to the Supreme Court, the Naples Review Court's prosecution case is solid: the individual acted as the operative arm of…
  • The investigation, conducted by the Carabinieri of Castello di Cisterna, revealed a complex criminal network active between 2023 and…

Key questions

What is the main point of the news?

The Supreme Court of Cassation has put a stop to the pre-trial detention of one of the alleged linchpins of the Licciardi clan's underground economy.

Why is this news relevant?

The prison sentence has been confirmed for a suspect accused of criminal conspiracy aimed at the illegal management…

Which detail helps us understand the case better?

According to the Supreme Court, the Naples Review Court's case is solid: the individual acted as the operational arm of the Secondigliano group, managing…

All Rights Reserved
Editorials (2)

Precautionary measures are appropriate when the social risks are high; however, we mustn't assume that all online networks are immediately mafia-run. Some networks are also managed in a shady way, and we need to better understand the economic flows and technical evidence to assess everything.

The Supreme Court of Cassation confirms precautionary custody for a suspect; it seems fair, but it's not a given. The wiretaps are clear, the judge says, but I think the facts need to be verified much more closely, because often the evidence isn't definitive and trials change.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ADVERTISING

Top News

ADVERTISING