Martina Carbonaro murder, the lawyer: "The prosecutor contested cruelty. She was shot in the back and on the ground."

Afragola – It wasn't just a rash act or a crime born of trivial motives. The death of Martina Carbonaro, the 14-year-old killed in Afragola on the night of May 27-28, 2025, was marked by "gratuitous brutality" and "excessive suffering" beyond that necessary to cause death.

The Naples Public Prosecutor's Office has put it in writing, fully charging the ex-boyfriend, Alessio Tucci, with the aggravating circumstance of cruelty.

The denial of the investigative rumors

Sergio Pisani, the lawyer representing the victim's family, has shed light on a crucial detail for the future trial. In the weeks following the announcement of the investigation's conclusion, rumors emerged that the magistrates had not found evidence of cruelty. This narrative has now been categorically denied by official documents.

"Contrary to what has been leaked," Pisani stated in a statement, "an analytical study of the documents, made available to me only after the preliminary hearing was scheduled, clearly reveals that the Public Prosecutor has contested the aggravating circumstance."

The dynamics in the indictment

Confirmation comes from a verbatim reading of the indictment formulated by the Neapolitan prosecutors, which describes the murderous sequence in all its drama. The investigations have reconstructed a ruthless attack. The killer, according to the documents cited by the defense, allegedly committed the crime "by first striking the victim from behind and then again when she was already slumped and lying on the ground."

Not only that, but the attack also allegedly involved "exerting manual pressure on the face and oral cavity." These shocking details point to a relentless assault on the young victim's body.

Beyond the trivial reasons

From a criminal procedural perspective, the prosecution's case now takes on a decidedly more serious character for the accused. According to the civil plaintiff's lawyer, the use of the phrase "and again" in the indictment represents a crucial legal turning point: it acts as a hinge between the challenge to the aggravating circumstance of frivolous motives and the description of conduct that is, intrinsically and objectively, cruel.

"This description," concludes Pisani, "underscores a ferocity that leaves no room for doubt as to the true intentions of the Prosecutor's Office." The matter now passes to the Preliminary Hearing Judge, who is called upon to examine a body of circumstantial evidence that appears to be extremely severe.